Panel
|
Abstraction
|
Time
|
Lines
|
Word/Image
|
Transition
|
1
|
3
|
Slow because the image takes up most of the page, so it
makes the reader slow down to look at each detail.
|
Warm and Gentle
|
Duo
|
1 to 2: Subject to Subject
|
2
|
1.5
|
Normal
|
Warm and Gentle
|
Additive
|
2 to 3: Scene to Scene
|
3
|
4
|
Fast because it’s the smallest panel and also it’s wider.
|
Weak and unstable
|
Additive
|
-
|
The top line of this blog are the theory and techniques guides for COMM 273. Along the left column you can see links to student work. Students post their public work here for COMM 273, Media and Popular Culture class at TLU.
Wednesday, September 5, 2018
Monstress Analysis
Thursday, October 5, 2017
Parent Trap Thesis
The Parent Trap is a romantic family comedy that brings light and optimism to children in families in “broken homes”. The filmmakers are helpful in achieving this and showing the differences in genre and social history by showing differences in parenting styles.
In the 1961 film we see a more strict style of parenting than we do in the 1998 film. There are many factors that could contribute to this including the rarity of divorce in the early 1960s as compared to the more increased divorce rates in the late 90s.
Adaptation Semiotic Thesis: Invasion of the Body Snatchers
When looking at "Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956)" and its themes of mystery, it shows America's social conditions and domestic issues throughout the film. It does this well by also incorporating Gothic fiction themes that gives a sense of fear of the supernatural, and fear of conformity through inexplicable means. Conformity was a common thing back in the 1950's, based off of research by Solomon Asch, and this movie was a step towards people realizing this. By the 1990's, the 1993 remake "Body Snatchers (1993)" goes full throttle on the subject of conformity in society. When looking at the timeline for these movies, we can conclude that our society has moved from the fear of the supernatural, and from being oblivious to hegemonic societies (1956) to the realization that society has normalized the thing that we fear most: losing our identities (1993).
Adaptation Semiotic Thesis: V for Vendetta
Thesis
V for Vendetta is one large socio-political statement, though the message is altered and watered down in the film due to the terrorist attacks of the early 2000's (namely 9/11 and the Amerithrax attacks) as a result it has a clear good vs evil narrative and pro-democracy overtones that were not in the original comic. The comic is far less black and white, with both sides having their fair share of evil deeds and truly believing that their means justify their ends. In the comic democracy has no real representation as the ideological struggle rests upon anarchy vs fascism, while in the comic it seems more like democracy vs authoritarianism or idealized liberalism vs a dark parody of neo-conservativism.
Changes/Support
In the comic V is an out and out terrorist, killing and psychologically torturing enemies and indoctrinating an underage prostitute into his radical ideology in hopes of destroying an evil authoritarian régime that genuinely thinks it is doing what is best for its people. It is a story of two extreme and deeply flawed ideologies fighting against eachother.
In the film V is a likable revolutionary akin to robin hood fighting against a horrifically evil authoritarian government for freedom.
The comic ends in a violent and chaotic riot akin to the Bolshevik revolution or French revolution. The film ends in an inspiring peaceful protest for democratic reform.
The film, released in 2005, takes place in 2020 after an epidemic has killed much of the population.
The comic, published in 1988, takes place in 1997 after a nuclear exchange between the US and USSR.
In the film the government is simply evil, but also somewhat incompetent. This is often interpreted as a jab at the Bush administration.
In the comic the government does evil things, but the people behind it are true believers in it. This is often interpreted as a jab a Margaret Thatcher's administration.
The film is about being democratically active so as to avoid the perils of authoritarianism.
The comic is about two extremes and the choice of the individual between difficult, chaotic self sufficiency under anarchy and safe, stable slavery under fascism or finding something between the two. There are no clear answers.
V for Vendetta is one large socio-political statement, though the message is altered and watered down in the film due to the terrorist attacks of the early 2000's (namely 9/11 and the Amerithrax attacks) as a result it has a clear good vs evil narrative and pro-democracy overtones that were not in the original comic. The comic is far less black and white, with both sides having their fair share of evil deeds and truly believing that their means justify their ends. In the comic democracy has no real representation as the ideological struggle rests upon anarchy vs fascism, while in the comic it seems more like democracy vs authoritarianism or idealized liberalism vs a dark parody of neo-conservativism.
Changes/Support
In the comic V is an out and out terrorist, killing and psychologically torturing enemies and indoctrinating an underage prostitute into his radical ideology in hopes of destroying an evil authoritarian régime that genuinely thinks it is doing what is best for its people. It is a story of two extreme and deeply flawed ideologies fighting against eachother.
In the film V is a likable revolutionary akin to robin hood fighting against a horrifically evil authoritarian government for freedom.
The comic ends in a violent and chaotic riot akin to the Bolshevik revolution or French revolution. The film ends in an inspiring peaceful protest for democratic reform.
The film, released in 2005, takes place in 2020 after an epidemic has killed much of the population.
The comic, published in 1988, takes place in 1997 after a nuclear exchange between the US and USSR.
In the film the government is simply evil, but also somewhat incompetent. This is often interpreted as a jab at the Bush administration.
In the comic the government does evil things, but the people behind it are true believers in it. This is often interpreted as a jab a Margaret Thatcher's administration.
The film is about being democratically active so as to avoid the perils of authoritarianism.
The comic is about two extremes and the choice of the individual between difficult, chaotic self sufficiency under anarchy and safe, stable slavery under fascism or finding something between the two. There are no clear answers.
Adaption Semiotic Thesis Blog Post - Jerrod Coss

The film Child's Play is about a serial killer named Charles Lee Ray who's soul and spirit is embedded into a doll by the name of Chucky. He spends his time killing and trying to transfer himself to a human body. This movie is a classic but it definitely added to the fears of others like most horror films have. Films like chucky has probably made a lot of children become scared of going to sleep in the dark or going to sleep alone. The film had a great effect on the entertainment business; But, this film and many others has inspired people, influenced people, and scared people to death.
History:
Released November 9, 1988
Filmed in Chicago
Support: What this film has caused then and now from it's effect -
Fear
Inspiration
Influential
More similar productions
Toys
Adaptation Semiotic Thesis Blog Post
Doom a game for the masses as being the pioneer of the first
person shooter. Coming out in 1993 the game signified more than just a gory
shooter where a unknown space marine known as “doomguy” tears through hordes of
demonic enemies but it has a deeper meaning of the fear of nuclear holocaust where
it would be hell on earth. Overtime this has stayed a constant even into the
new 2016 adaptation. This is formed through the use of new graphics and a new
plot to create a representational connection between Doom the game and the
world issues at that time.
Support
Fears of the 90’s
1)
Hole in the Ozone layer
2)
Satanic Cults
3)
Soviet Nukes
Which create the
first plot of Doom
1)
Portal to hell
2)
Hordes of Demons
3)
Hell on Earth, everything is burning or dead
“Where Are They Now? Things That Terrified Us in the '90s.” Where
Are They Now? 8 Things That Terrified Us in the '90s | Mental Floss, 8 July
2015,
mentalfloss.com/article/49985/where-are-they-now-8-things-terrified-us-90s.
Support
Fear of the 2000’s
1)
Infection
2)
Undead, alien invasions
3)
Nuclear terrorist attacks
Which create the
new adaptation
1)
Portal to hell of our own creation
2)
Hordes of ungodly creatures that are not of this
world
3)
Hell on Earth, everything is gone or burning
“Disaster Films.” An award-Winning, unique resource of film
reference material for film buffs and others, with reviews of classic
American-Hollywood films, Academy Awards history, film posters.,
www.filmsite.org/disasterfilms.html.
Tuesday, October 3, 2017
Powerpuff Girls Semiotic Data
These two iterations of the
Powerpuff Girls give very different perspectives on the ideas of how children’s
media should be as well as how to progress/express feminism in a constructive
manner. Both episodes picked focus on the girls fighting a traditionally masculine
villain and how they overcome the obstacle. While both shows are aimed at
expressing a “girl power” message and attempt to appeal to a young demographic,
both do so in very different ways that reflect the era of the shows creation.
While the original Powerpuff Girls feels like an action show with feminist undertones and lessons, the new one feels more centered on getting a message across and putting the storyline second. The genre is undoubtedly action/comedy for both; however the ways in which they treat their audience and present their overarching societal message are entirely different.
1990’s: The Rowdyruff Boys
-Mojo Jojo is using traditionally masculine/gross things to
create male counterparts for the girls, returning to schoolyard ideals of boy
vs girl
(boys: snips, snails, and a puppy dog’s tail - and girls: sugar, spice, and everything nice)
-Brick, Boomer, and Butch are stereotypes for young boys;
being violent, “gross,” and unruly. They are direct counterparts to the girls, with
very similar appearances to them

-The boys treat the girls in regards with schoolyard ideals
of boy’s vs girls; referencing sexism. This is in contradiction to reality, as
they appear to be equally matched. Also, the girls seem to partake in this
minimally.
-The differences of man v woman are even shown in fight
sequences, with the men using more direct force and women are fighting with
relative grace; even using acrobatics in comparison to boxing and martial arts. However, they are portrayed to be equally effective styles.
-An interesting addition here is Mrs. Bellum, who is the
Mayor’s secretary, when he dismisses the girls slamming against the window she
brings the importance of the event to his attention. Later, she is allowed
emotion and is the one who wakes up the girls after defeat. She even convinces the
girls to stay in Townsville and gives them the advice needed to defeat the boys.
-At the end, Buttercup is used to dispute the idea that
little girls like kissing; breaking an ideal
The episode largely focuses on
men and women being equal, as shown in fight scenes. The ideals of sexism are
there, but are mostly integrated into the story rather than being outwardly
stated. They also challenge traditional gender stereotypes through Buttercup at
the end
-If we look at the humor and direction of the show, the humor
is subverted and generally not “loud and in-your-face.” The audience is
required to pay attention and be interactive with the media to gain the
full-effect of the media. The show requires investment and challenges the minds
of the audience with subtle humor that spans the test of time rather than be era-specific.
-The 1990’s was a period that focused heavily on the ideal of
feminism and equal opportunity. It heavily pushed the ideal that men and women
should be equal and properly represented in society. However, there was a large
counter movement that hated feminist ideology. This put feminist propaganda in
a strange spot: they couldn’t state it outright but it also needed to get the
message forward. The Powerpuff Girls demonstrates this as the ideals of
feminism are woven into the story rather than be directly stated.
2016: Man-Up
-In the first scene, the main villain (a traditionally
masculine lumberjack) tells Buttercup she “throws like a girl” and calls her a
“princess” which throws her in a frenzy; showing misogynistic ideals from
Man-Boy (our villain) and a direct response from the girls.
-The humor is less nuanced than in the original, it uses a
lot of repetition and loud/outward humor
-When the other girls are talking to Buttercup, the message is
incredibly forward and not hidden whatsoever, something common in modern
children’s media.
-The main villain is the embodiment of masculinity; using a
giant wooden robot/tank as his weapons and he has an army of raw steaks. He has a
large beard, short hair, and has a large, muscular frame and he frequently
shows off his muscles. He’s trying to spread “manliness” across Townsville.

-The girls revile in disgust after Man-Boy demonstrates his
ability to regrow his beard instantly, showing traditional schoolyard boy v
girl ideologies. Blossom later complains when man boy returns by saying “men,” implying disdain for masculine ideals.
-At the end of the episode, the embodiment of masculinity is
defeated by a contradiction of his character and what could be considered a
representation of feminine ideals; a block of tofu.
The episode seems to be centered
not so much on equality, but on the conflict of masculine and feminine ideals
and may even suggest that the latter is “better” than the patriarchy. The
message is stated outright and can be picked up by a young audience. They use
traditional ideals as a battleground rather than challenge them.
-The humor and feeling of the show is much more flashy and
outward. Most of the jokes require little-to-no thought to understand and tend
to play off things popular in the era of the show. Little investment is
required to keep the audience entertained, and the audience is not challenged.
Most of the humor is juvenile and slapstick, and largely based off of popular culture of the 2010's.
-The way feminism is shown is much more direct, reflecting
the 2010’s modern-feminist movement. Feminism was brought to the mainstream
through news outlets, protests, music, and social media (i.e. tumblr, reddit,
and buzzfeed) and the show reflects this trend. Rather than subverting the
message, we quite literally have the embodiment of masculinity being taken down
by feminine ideology. They use gender ideals as a literal battleground. The girls even state their disdain for male culture by
exclaiming “men” and reject gender-specific labels outright.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)