Thursday, October 5, 2017

Parent Trap Thesis

The Parent Trap is a romantic family comedy that brings light and optimism to children in families in “broken homes”. The filmmakers are helpful in achieving this and showing the differences in genre and social history by showing differences in parenting styles.

In the 1961 film we see a more strict style of parenting than we do in the 1998 film. There are many factors that could contribute to this including the rarity of divorce in the early 1960s as compared to the more increased divorce rates in the late 90s.

Adaptation Semiotic Thesis: Invasion of the Body Snatchers

When looking at "Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956)" and its themes of mystery, it shows America's social conditions and domestic issues throughout the film. It does this well by also incorporating Gothic fiction themes that gives a sense of fear of the supernatural, and fear of conformity through inexplicable means. Conformity was a common thing back in the 1950's, based off of research by Solomon Asch, and this movie was a step towards people realizing this. By the 1990's, the 1993 remake "Body Snatchers (1993)" goes full throttle on the subject of conformity in society. When looking at the timeline for these movies, we can conclude that our society has moved from the fear of the supernatural, and from being oblivious to hegemonic societies (1956) to the realization that society has normalized the thing that we fear most: losing our identities (1993).

Adaptation Semiotic Thesis: V for Vendetta

Thesis
V for Vendetta is one large socio-political statement, though the message is altered and watered down in the film due to the terrorist attacks of the early 2000's (namely 9/11 and the Amerithrax attacks) as a result it has a clear good vs evil narrative and pro-democracy overtones that were not in the original comic. The comic is far less black and white, with both sides having their fair share of evil deeds and truly believing that their means justify their ends. In the comic democracy has no real representation as the ideological struggle rests upon anarchy vs fascism, while in the comic it seems more like democracy vs authoritarianism or idealized liberalism vs a dark parody of neo-conservativism.

Changes/Support
In the comic V is an out and out terrorist, killing and psychologically torturing enemies and indoctrinating an underage prostitute into his radical ideology in hopes of destroying an evil authoritarian régime that genuinely thinks it is doing what is best for its people. It is a story of two extreme and deeply flawed ideologies fighting against eachother.
In the film V is a likable revolutionary akin to robin hood fighting against a horrifically evil authoritarian government for freedom.

The comic ends in a violent and chaotic riot akin to the Bolshevik revolution or French revolution. The film ends in an inspiring peaceful protest for democratic reform.      

The film, released in 2005, takes place in 2020 after an epidemic has killed much of the population.
The comic, published in 1988, takes place in 1997 after a nuclear exchange between the US and USSR.

In the film the government is simply evil, but also somewhat incompetent. This is often interpreted as a jab at the Bush administration.
In the comic the government does evil things, but the people behind it are true believers in it. This is often interpreted as a jab a Margaret Thatcher's administration.

The film is about being democratically active so as to avoid the perils of authoritarianism.
The comic is about two extremes and the choice of the individual between difficult, chaotic self sufficiency under anarchy and safe, stable slavery under fascism or finding something between the two. There are no clear answers.

Adaption Semiotic Thesis Blog Post - Jerrod Coss

Image result for Chucky


The film Child's Play is about a serial killer named Charles Lee Ray who's soul and spirit is embedded into a doll by the name of Chucky.  He spends his time killing and trying to transfer himself to a human body.  This movie is a classic but it definitely added to the fears of others like most horror films have. Films like chucky has probably made a lot of children become scared of going to sleep in the dark or going to sleep alone.  The film had a great effect on the entertainment business; But, this film and many others has inspired people, influenced people, and scared people to death.


History:
Released November 9, 1988
Filmed in Chicago


Support: What this film has caused then and now from it's effect -
Fear
Inspiration
Influential
More similar productions
Toys







Adaptation Semiotic Thesis Blog Post

Doom a game for the masses as being the pioneer of the first person shooter. Coming out in 1993 the game signified more than just a gory shooter where a unknown space marine known as “doomguy” tears through hordes of demonic enemies but it has a deeper meaning of the fear of nuclear holocaust where it would be hell on earth. Overtime this has stayed a constant even into the new 2016 adaptation. This is formed through the use of new graphics and a new plot to create a representational connection between Doom the game and the world issues at that time.

Support

Fears of the 90’s
1)   Hole in the Ozone layer
2)   Satanic Cults
3)   Soviet Nukes
Which create the first plot of Doom
1)   Portal to hell
2)   Hordes of Demons
3)   Hell on Earth, everything is burning or dead

“Where Are They Now? Things That Terrified Us in the '90s.” Where Are They Now? 8 Things That Terrified Us in the '90s | Mental Floss, 8 July 2015, mentalfloss.com/article/49985/where-are-they-now-8-things-terrified-us-90s.

Support

Fear of the 2000’s
1)   Infection
2)   Undead, alien invasions
3)   Nuclear terrorist attacks
Which create the new adaptation
1)   Portal to hell of our own creation
2)   Hordes of ungodly creatures that are not of this world
3)   Hell on Earth, everything is gone or burning

“Disaster Films.” An award-Winning, unique resource of film reference material for film buffs and others, with reviews of classic American-Hollywood films, Academy Awards history, film posters., www.filmsite.org/disasterfilms.html.

Tuesday, October 3, 2017

Powerpuff Girls Semiotic Data

These two iterations of the Powerpuff Girls give very different perspectives on the ideas of how children’s media should be as well as how to progress/express feminism in a constructive manner. Both episodes picked focus on the girls fighting a traditionally masculine villain and how they overcome the obstacle. While both shows are aimed at expressing a “girl power” message and attempt to appeal to a young demographic, both do so in very different ways that reflect the era of the shows creation.

While the original Powerpuff Girls feels like an action show with feminist undertones and lessons, the new one feels more centered on getting a message across and putting the storyline second. The genre is undoubtedly action/comedy for both; however the ways in which they treat their audience and present their overarching societal message are entirely different.

1990’s: The Rowdyruff Boys

-Mojo Jojo is using traditionally masculine/gross things to create male counterparts for the girls, returning to schoolyard ideals of boy vs girl 
(boys: snips, snails, and a puppy dog’s tail - and girls: sugar, spice, and everything nice)
-Brick, Boomer, and Butch are stereotypes for young boys; being violent, “gross,” and unruly. They are direct counterparts to the girls, with very similar appearances to them
Image result for the rowdyruff boys
-The boys treat the girls in regards with schoolyard ideals of boy’s vs girls; referencing sexism. This is in contradiction to reality, as they appear to be equally matched. Also, the girls seem to partake in this minimally.
-The differences of man v woman are even shown in fight sequences, with the men using more direct force and women are fighting with relative grace; even using acrobatics in comparison to boxing and martial arts. However, they are portrayed to be equally effective styles.
-An interesting addition here is Mrs. Bellum, who is the Mayor’s secretary, when he dismisses the girls slamming against the window she brings the importance of the event to his attention. Later, she is allowed emotion and is the one who wakes up the girls after defeat. She even convinces the girls to stay in Townsville and gives them the advice needed to defeat the boys.
-At the end, Buttercup is used to dispute the idea that little girls like kissing; breaking an ideal


The episode largely focuses on men and women being equal, as shown in fight scenes. The ideals of sexism are there, but are mostly integrated into the story rather than being outwardly stated. They also challenge traditional gender stereotypes through Buttercup at the end


-If we look at the humor and direction of the show, the humor is subverted and generally not “loud and in-your-face.” The audience is required to pay attention and be interactive with the media to gain the full-effect of the media. The show requires investment and challenges the minds of the audience with subtle humor that spans the test of time rather than be era-specific.

-The 1990’s was a period that focused heavily on the ideal of feminism and equal opportunity. It heavily pushed the ideal that men and women should be equal and properly represented in society. However, there was a large counter movement that hated feminist ideology. This put feminist propaganda in a strange spot: they couldn’t state it outright but it also needed to get the message forward. The Powerpuff Girls demonstrates this as the ideals of feminism are woven into the story rather than be directly stated.



2016: Man-Up

-In the first scene, the main villain (a traditionally masculine lumberjack) tells Buttercup she “throws like a girl” and calls her a “princess” which throws her in a frenzy; showing misogynistic ideals from Man-Boy (our villain) and a direct response from the girls.
-The humor is less nuanced than in the original, it uses a lot of repetition and loud/outward humor
-When the other girls are talking to Buttercup, the message is incredibly forward and not hidden whatsoever, something common in modern children’s media.
-The main villain is the embodiment of masculinity; using a giant wooden robot/tank as his weapons and he has an army of raw steaks. He has a large beard, short hair, and has a large, muscular frame and he frequently shows off his muscles. He’s trying to spread “manliness” across Townsville.
Image result for man boy powerpuff girls
-The girls revile in disgust after Man-Boy demonstrates his ability to regrow his beard instantly, showing traditional schoolyard boy v girl ideologies. Blossom later complains when man boy returns by saying “men,” implying disdain for masculine ideals.
-At the end of the episode, the embodiment of masculinity is defeated by a contradiction of his character and what could be considered a representation of feminine ideals; a block of tofu.


The episode seems to be centered not so much on equality, but on the conflict of masculine and feminine ideals and may even suggest that the latter is “better” than the patriarchy. The message is stated outright and can be picked up by a young audience. They use traditional ideals as a battleground rather than challenge them.


-The humor and feeling of the show is much more flashy and outward. Most of the jokes require little-to-no thought to understand and tend to play off things popular in the era of the show. Little investment is required to keep the audience entertained, and the audience is not challenged. Most of the humor is juvenile and slapstick, and largely based off of popular culture of the 2010's.

-The way feminism is shown is much more direct, reflecting the 2010’s modern-feminist movement. Feminism was brought to the mainstream through news outlets, protests, music, and social media (i.e. tumblr, reddit, and buzzfeed) and the show reflects this trend. Rather than subverting the message, we quite literally have the embodiment of masculinity being taken down by feminine ideology. They use gender ideals as a literal battleground. The girls even state their disdain for male culture by exclaiming “men” and reject gender-specific labels outright.

The Parent Trap (1961) VS (1998)



Parent Trap Blog Post Analysis

    For my assignment, I will be comparing the original production of The Parent Trap (1961) in comparison to the “newer” film starring Lindsay Lohan (1998). One of the aspects I will be analyzing is the difference in the parenting styles in the year 1961 and 1998.
    I feel that in the 1960s parents had more control over their children than they did in the late 90s.  I found an interesting article to help better understand these differences.
    “...today’s parents, compared with 1950s parents, are paying more attention to, doing more things for, providing more help to, and praising their kids far, far more than did 1950s parents…parents did not seek our opinion about such things as what we would deign to eat for dinner and did not care whether we approved of their choices or not. Furthermore, they did not care how we felt about any decision they made. We were given reason to control our emotions rather than let them control us.” (Rosemond)
    In the late 1990s, we saw more technology released and used, there were more people using cell phones (the TV shows were better, life was simpler… I was also a toddler which may have had some effect on the simplicity of things lol).
There are many scenes in both Parent Trap films where the differences in parenting are evident.
One example is when the father announces to his daughter his intentions of remarrying.
In the 1961 version, when “Susan” begins to protest the father becomes angry, he yells at her to stop shouting and ends the conversation.
However, in the 1998 version while the conversation still doesn’t go well, the scene is very light-hearted and comical. When “Hallie” starts yelling in French, the dad is not strict at all, allows it to happen, and doesn’t seem to upset when she storms out of the house.
Another example is when the daughter living in England receives a telegram (or fax, 1998). Once again, we see a lack of discipline in the 1998 film.
In the 1961 film the family demands to see the telegram “Sharon” receives and the meaning behind the message, later we see the grandpa eavesdrop on her phone call. Later the Grandma is giving a schedule of the day, when Sharon interrupts and is scolded for her actions.
While in the 1998 butler finds fax, “Annie” asks to step out and literally freaking leaves the house and runs to use a telephone, (this was always crazy to me, maybe I don’t fully understand culture in England but if I left the dinner table and ran away a few blocks my mom would have kicked my butt) When her mom has plans they are a question/suggestion, rarely an order.
The final comparison I have for this topic is when the families realize the switch, once again the 1998 film seems to portray the parents as complete pushovers.
In the 1961 film when the family in England realizes the twins switched places there is initially confusion, and slight anger from the mother, then she is nice, and sad she didn't know it was Susan.
In the 1998 film when the family in California realizes the difference, the maid is very emotional and happy, wants to make her everything in the kitchen. The dad is never mad, he’s a mixture of happy and excited but still confused.
When the family in England catches on, the mom cries and is not angry (until she realizes she must see her ex-husband again lol).
In both locations, the girls are never yelled at and are not punished until they return to California.
           In conclusion, I feel like parenting styles will vary depending on location, culture and the times. While in the Parent Trap the parents in the 1961 filmed were seemingly more stern and the 1998 film more lenient, I feel if we saw another remake in 2018 (20 years later holy moly), we would circle back to parents being more firm with their children.

The social issues and differences of "Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956)" and "Body Snatchers (1993)" by Montrell Wiley

Abstract 
This paper presents five articles and two websites that all help explain the context and themes of the 1956 film "Invasion of the Body Snatchers(IBS) directed by Don Siegel, while also doing the same for the 1993 remake of the film "Body Snatchers" (BS) directed by Abel Ferrara. Each source gives different inputs on what helped influenced the film's creation, while also noting their time periods and social conditions of that time. Jenkins (2012) points to the domestic issues of post-World War II that IBS portrays, and argues that the film's genre is a Gothic representation of the social conditions of the US at that time. Meanwhile, Hendershot (1998) speaks on the paranoia of radiation contamination in a postwar America. When moving up almost forty years, Ebert (1994) talks about BS and its connection with military conformity and also the AIDS epidemic. Liss (2001) tells us how these films can teach us post-World War II history. Telotte (1983) touches more on the science and biology of the film, which connects with how we as a species want to abdicate from human "responsibility", as in becoming an automaton like the people become in the movie can actually be desirable. Wikipedia just gives us some more general information about the films. 
  • Body Snatchers (1993)



The main argument for this movie is within its portrayals of conformity and of what the government and military are like. 


Syntagmatic 

"...we spend half our lives asleep."  
This quote gives the impression that the main character believes that everyone is "asleep" or that they can't see what is really going on in the society and world around them. It is parallel to the more modern saying of "being woke"  

Chemist:"You got a lot of chemicals in this [military] base, they're all pretty toxic..."  
Captain: "I'm not talking about physical [effects], I am talking about psychological." 

These "chemicals" can very well be talking about the effects  that joining the military have on the people who join. Joining compels them to conform. 


Paradigmatic

In this scene, which starts before the 10 minute mark, it sets the tone pretty well and shows themes early on. 

Here, the protagonist is surrounded by army guards, or surrounded by authority. 
But then another "cool" girl shows up in a Firebird knockoff and saves her. The movie gives her the image of being an anarchist or someone who doesn't conform to society.

              In another scene, we find a school teacher teaching children how to paint. The ironic part about this scene, is that painting is completely artistic and unique, but the teacher is telling them exactly what to paint ridding them of their uniqueness.


All of the children hold up the same painting 
Only one little boy held up a unique painting

The boy felt isolated, different, and obviously confused as to why his didn't look like everybody else's

Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956)

Some argue that this movie is a work of Gothic fiction, and there are a few factors that give this idea life within the movie. 

Syntagmatic
In the Gothic novel, the atmosphere will be one of mystery, suspense, and fear, the mood of which is only enhanced by elements of the unknown or unexplained. (Thoughtco.com) All of these themes come into play in this movie, as no one understands what exactly is wrong with the people who seem different or the people who are experiencing hysteria.


Oftentimes Gothic fiction will contain elements of the supernatural or paranormal...In some instances, these supernatural features are later explained in perfectly natural terms, but in other works, they remain completely inexplicable. (Thoughtco.com) The only thing that the people of the town know about these impostors is that they come from plant-like pods in the ground. Keeping their origin inexplicable makes a strong lead towards being Gothic fiction.

Paradigmatic

Becky, the protagonist's love interest, is the only female in the movie who is not blonde. She has dark hair and eyebrows, and wears darker lipstick. This could be trying to portray her as a Gothic heroine, as black often refers to death or horror.

References
 
Burgess, Adam, (2017, August 07) "An Introduction to Gothic Literature" ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-gothic-literature-739030 
Ebert, Roger, (1994-02-25). "Body Snatchers Review"Chicago Sun-Times. 
Hendershot, Cyndy(1998). "The Invaded Body: Paranoia & Radiation Anxiety in Invaders from Mars, It Came from Outer Space & Invasion of the Body Snatchers." Kent State University Press 
Invasion of the Body Snatchers. (2017, September 23). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 
Jenkins, Jennifer L., (2012). "'Lovelier the Second Time Around': Divorce, Desire, and Gothic Domesticity in Invasion of the Body Snatchers."The Journal of Popular Culture Volume: 45 Issue 3 
Liss, Neil. (2001). "'FILMS FOR OUR TIME: USING "INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS' TO TEACH RECENT AMERICAN HISTORY." Teaching History: A Journal of Methods Volume: 26 Issue 1 
Telotte, J. (1983). Human Artifice and the Science Fiction Film. Film Quarterly, 36(3), 44-51. doi:10.2307/3697349