|
Panel #
|
Abstraction
|
Panel Transition
|
Time/Speed
|
Line
|
Words/Images
|
|
1
|
Coworker: 4
Archie: 3
|
|
|
Archie and his coworkers lines
are dynamic, where the background is very thin
|
Duo specific
|
|
2
|
Coworker: 3
|
Action to Action
|
Slides 1&2 are fast (seconds apart)
|
Archie’s face lines are sharp, where his coworkers lines are more
round and gentle
|
Duo specific
|
|
3
|
Archie: 3
|
Subject to Subject
|
Slides 2&3 are fast
|
The lines on Archie are very thin
|
Interdependent
|
|
4
|
All: 4
|
Scene to Scene
|
Slides 3&4 are very slow (viewing the past)
|
The lines in the picture are all gentle
|
Word specific
|
|
5
|
All: 4
|
Subject to Subject
|
Slides 4&5 are normal (minutes apart)
|
The lines in this slide are very round and thin
|
Word specific
|
|
6
|
Both: 4
|
Scene to Scene
|
Slides 5&6 are very slow (back to present)
|
The lines in the background are thick, where the characters lines are
thin
|
Interdependent
|
Thursday, September 3, 2015
Heartbreak Soup Table
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Based on your table, your argument looks valid. Your descriptions of lines are very detailed and accurate. Being able to access your analysis and comic page would be more helpful, but as far as the table goes, I'd say that you knew what you were doing and had a good idea of what you were analyzing.
ReplyDelete