The top line of this blog are the theory and techniques guides for COMM 273. Along the left column you can see links to student work. Students post their public work here for COMM 273, Media and Popular Culture class at TLU.
When comparing the online comic to pages 206 and 207, you see a few tine details that seem insignificant. The cat girl is less cat like online, then in the book. During the audition panels the posters on the back wall are different. I find this interesting because in the book it almost looks as if the face in the poster is talking or commenting. My eye kept wondering towards that. You also have the cat, and two headed figure in the panels, maybe the author is suggesting that music is satanic, or evil in some way. Also in 206 and online when they enter the garage it looks like a church. You see high points in the roof line and a cross at the highest peak. Online you see a similar image but it is more distant.
When comparing the online comic to pages 206 and 207, you see a few tine details that seem insignificant. The cat girl is less cat like online, then in the book. During the audition panels the posters on the back wall are different. I find this interesting because in the book it almost looks as if the face in the poster is talking or commenting. My eye kept wondering towards that. You also have the cat, and two headed figure in the panels, maybe the author is suggesting that music is satanic, or evil in some way. Also in 206 and online when they enter the garage it looks like a church. You see high points in the roof line and a cross at the highest peak. Online you see a similar image but it is more distant.
Your analysis of the panels all look good to me. As far as a thesis goes you could possibly compare the online panels to the book panels and question why some panels are the exact same but some panels have slight differences. Like the fact that the background is different online than it is in the book.
Your analysis looks good and simple. However, I think maybe you could go into a little more detail on why you think the author made the time/speed or abstraction the way he did. That'll give you a little more thought towards your argument come the day of our speech.
When comparing the online comic to pages 206 and 207, you see a few tine details that seem insignificant. The cat girl is less cat like online, then in the book. During the audition panels the posters on the back wall are different. I find this interesting because in the book it almost looks as if the face in the poster is talking or commenting. My eye kept wondering towards that. You also have the cat, and two headed figure in the panels, maybe the author is suggesting that music is satanic, or evil in some way. Also in 206 and online when they enter the garage it looks like a church. You see high points in the roof line and a cross at the highest peak. Online you see a similar image but it is more distant.
ReplyDeleteWhen comparing the online comic to pages 206 and 207, you see a few tine details that seem insignificant. The cat girl is less cat like online, then in the book. During the audition panels the posters on the back wall are different. I find this interesting because in the book it almost looks as if the face in the poster is talking or commenting. My eye kept wondering towards that. You also have the cat, and two headed figure in the panels, maybe the author is suggesting that music is satanic, or evil in some way. Also in 206 and online when they enter the garage it looks like a church. You see high points in the roof line and a cross at the highest peak. Online you see a similar image but it is more distant.
ReplyDeleteYour analysis of the panels all look good to me. As far as a thesis goes you could possibly compare the online panels to the book panels and question why some panels are the exact same but some panels have slight differences. Like the fact that the background is different online than it is in the book.
ReplyDeleteYour analysis looks good and simple. However, I think maybe you could go into a little more detail on why you think the author made the time/speed or abstraction the way he did. That'll give you a little more thought towards your argument come the day of our speech.
ReplyDelete